Kaydet (Commit) fb349427 authored tarafından Barry Warsaw's avatar Barry Warsaw

#comment update, re: py-mode-syntax-table

üst 9e5a9c8c
...@@ -323,10 +323,11 @@ Currently-active file is at the head of the list.") ...@@ -323,10 +323,11 @@ Currently-active file is at the head of the list.")
( ?\* . "." ) ( ?\+ . "." ) ( ?\- . "." ) ( ?\* . "." ) ( ?\+ . "." ) ( ?\- . "." )
( ?\/ . "." ) ( ?\< . "." ) ( ?\= . "." ) ( ?\/ . "." ) ( ?\< . "." ) ( ?\= . "." )
( ?\> . "." ) ( ?\| . "." ) ( ?\> . "." ) ( ?\| . "." )
;; Guido and I disagree about this. Underscore should be ;; for historical reasons, underscore is word class
;; symbol constituent by not word. For historical ;; instead of symbol class. it should be symbol class,
;; reasons, I leave it as is. -baw ;; but if you're tempted to change it, try binding M-f and
;;( ?\_ . "_" ) ; underscore is legit in symbols, but not words ;; M-b to py-forward-into-nomenclature and
;; py-backward-into-nomenclature instead. -baw
( ?\_ . "w" ) ; underscore is legit in words ( ?\_ . "w" ) ; underscore is legit in words
( ?\' . "\"") ; single quote is string quote ( ?\' . "\"") ; single quote is string quote
( ?\" . "\"" ) ; double quote is string quote too ( ?\" . "\"" ) ; double quote is string quote too
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment