PostgreSQL specific model fields
================================

All of these fields are available from the ``django.contrib.postgres.fields``
module.

.. currentmodule:: django.contrib.postgres.fields

ArrayField
----------

.. class:: ArrayField(base_field, size=None, **options)

    A field for storing lists of data. Most field types can be used, you simply
    pass another field instance as the :attr:`base_field
    <ArrayField.base_field>`. You may also specify a :attr:`size
    <ArrayField.size>`. ``ArrayField`` can be nested to store multi-dimensional
    arrays.

    .. attribute:: base_field

        This is a required argument.

        Specifies the underlying data type and behavior for the array. It
        should be an instance of a subclass of
        :class:`~django.db.models.Field`. For example, it could be an
        :class:`~django.db.models.IntegerField` or a
        :class:`~django.db.models.CharField`. Most field types are permitted,
        with the exception of those handling relational data
        (:class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey`,
        :class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField` and
        :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField`).

        It is possible to nest array fields - you can specify an instance of
        ``ArrayField`` as the ``base_field``. For example::

            from django.db import models
            from django.contrib.postgres.fields import ArrayField

            class ChessBoard(models.Model):
                board = ArrayField(
                    ArrayField(
                        CharField(max_length=10, blank=True, null=True),
                        size=8),
                    size=8)

        Transformation of values between the database and the model, validation
        of data and configuration, and serialization are all delegated to the
        underlying base field.

    .. attribute:: size

        This is an optional argument.

        If passed, the array will have a maximum size as specified. This will
        be passed to the database, although PostgreSQL at present does not
        enforce the restriction.

.. note::

    When nesting ``ArrayField``, whether you use the `size` parameter or not,
    PostgreSQL requires that the arrays are rectangular::

        from django.db import models
        from django.contrib.postgres.fields import ArrayField

        class Board(models.Model):
            pieces = ArrayField(ArrayField(models.IntegerField()))

        # Valid
        Board(pieces=[
            [2, 3],
            [2, 1],
        ])

        # Not valid
        Board(pieces=[
            [2, 3],
            [2],
        ])

    If irregular shapes are required, then the underlying field should be made
    nullable and the values padded with ``None``.

Querying ArrayField
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

There are a number of custom lookups and transforms for :class:`ArrayField`.
We will use the following example model::

    from django.db import models
    from django.contrib.postgres.fields import ArrayField

    class Post(models.Model):
        name = models.CharField(max_length=200)
        tags = ArrayField(models.CharField(max_length=200), blank=True)

        def __str__(self):  # __unicode__ on python 2
            return self.name

.. fieldlookup:: arrayfield.contains

contains
~~~~~~~~

The :lookup:`contains` lookup is overridden on :class:`ArrayField`. The
returned objects will be those where the values passed are a subset of the
data. It uses the SQL operator ``@>``. For example::

    >>> Post.objects.create(name='First post', tags=['thoughts', 'django'])
    >>> Post.objects.create(name='Second post', tags=['thoughts'])
    >>> Post.objects.create(name='Third post', tags=['tutorial', 'django'])

    >>> Post.objects.filter(tags__contains=['thoughts'])
    [<Post: First post>, <Post: Second post>]

    >>> Post.objects.filter(tags__contains=['django'])
    [<Post: First post>, <Post: Third post>]

    >>> Post.objects.filter(tags__contains=['django', 'thoughts'])
    [<Post: First post>]

.. fieldlookup:: arrayfield.contained_by

contained_by
~~~~~~~~~~~~

This is the inverse of the :lookup:`contains <arrayfield.contains>` lookup -
the objects returned will be those where the data is a subset of the values
passed. It uses the SQL operator ``<@``. For example::

    >>> Post.objects.create(name='First post', tags=['thoughts', 'django'])
    >>> Post.objects.create(name='Second post', tags=['thoughts'])
    >>> Post.objects.create(name='Third post', tags=['tutorial', 'django'])

    >>> Post.objects.filter(tags__contained_by=['thoughts', 'django'])
    [<Post: First post>, <Post: Second post>]

    >>> Post.objects.filter(tags__contained_by=['thoughts', 'django', 'tutorial'])
    [<Post: First post>, <Post: Second post>, <Post: Third post>]

.. fieldlookup:: arrayfield.overlap

overlap
~~~~~~~

Returns objects where the data shares any results with the values passed. Uses
the SQL operator ``&&``. For example::

    >>> Post.objects.create(name='First post', tags=['thoughts', 'django'])
    >>> Post.objects.create(name='Second post', tags=['thoughts'])
    >>> Post.objects.create(name='Third post', tags=['tutorial', 'django'])

    >>> Post.objects.filter(tags__overlap=['thoughts'])
    [<Post: First post>, <Post: Second post>]

    >>> Post.objects.filter(tags__overlap=['thoughts', 'tutorial'])
    [<Post: First post>, <Post: Second post>, <Post: Third post>]

.. fieldlookup:: arrayfield.len

len
~~~

Returns the length of the array. The lookups available afterwards are those
available for :class:`~django.db.models.IntegerField`. For example::

    >>> Post.objects.create(name='First post', tags=['thoughts', 'django'])
    >>> Post.objects.create(name='Second post', tags=['thoughts'])

    >>> Post.objects.filter(tags__len=1)
    [<Post: Second post>]

.. fieldlookup:: arrayfield.index

Index transforms
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This class of transforms allows you to index into the array in queries. Any
non-negative integer can be used. There are no errors if it exceeds the
:attr:`size <ArrayField.size>` of the array. The lookups available after the
transform are those from the :attr:`base_field <ArrayField.base_field>`. For
example::

    >>> Post.objects.create(name='First post', tags=['thoughts', 'django'])
    >>> Post.objects.create(name='Second post', tags=['thoughts'])

    >>> Post.objects.filter(tags__0='thoughts')
    [<Post: First post>, <Post: Second post>]

    >>> Post.objects.filter(tags__1__iexact='Django')
    [<Post: First post>]

    >>> Post.objects.filter(tags__276='javascript')
    []

.. note::

    PostgreSQL uses 1-based indexing for array fields when writing raw SQL.
    However these indexes and those used in :lookup:`slices <arrayfield.slice>`
    use 0-based indexing to be consistent with Python.

.. fieldlookup:: arrayfield.slice

Slice transforms
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This class of transforms allow you to take a slice of the array. Any two
non-negative integers can be used, separated by a single underscore. The
lookups available after the transform do not change. For example::

    >>> Post.objects.create(name='First post', tags=['thoughts', 'django'])
    >>> Post.objects.create(name='Second post', tags=['thoughts'])
    >>> Post.objects.create(name='Third post', tags=['django', 'python', 'thoughts'])

    >>> Post.objects.filter(tags__0_1=['thoughts'])
    [<Post: First post>]

    >>> Post.objects.filter(tags__0_2__contains='thoughts')
    [<Post: First post>, <Post: Second post>]

.. note::

    PostgreSQL uses 1-based indexing for array fields when writing raw SQL.
    However these slices and those used in :lookup:`indexes <arrayfield.index>`
    use 0-based indexing to be consistent with Python.

.. admonition:: Multidimensional arrays with indexes and slices

    PostgreSQL has some rather esoteric behavior when using indexes and slices
    on multidimensional arrays. It will always work to use indexes to reach
    down to the final underlying data, but most other slices behave strangely
    at the database level and cannot be supported in a logical, consistent
    fashion by Django.

Indexing ArrayField
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

At present using :attr:`~django.db.models.Field.db_index` will create a
``btree`` index. This does not offer particularly significant help to querying.
A more useful index is a ``GIN`` index, which you should create using a
:class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunSQL` operation.
