For Christmas I received an interesting gift from a pal - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a few basic triggers about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and really funny in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of composing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collecting information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, galgbtqhistoryproject.org considering that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can order any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody creating one in any person's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, developed by AI, tandme.co.uk and created "entirely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is intended as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get offered even more.

He wants to expand his variety, producing various genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps using an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are discussing information here, we in fact mean human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for innovative functions should be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without consent need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely powerful but let's construct it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to utilize developers' content on the web to help develop their models, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise strongly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening one of its finest carrying out markets on the unclear promise of development."

A government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made until we are absolutely positive we have a useful strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for best holders to assist them accredit their material, access to high-quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a national information library including public data from a large range of sources will also be made available to AI .

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share details of the operations of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to want the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a number of suits versus AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can constitute fair use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and whether it need to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for a fraction of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and forum.batman.gainedge.org it can be rather difficult to check out in parts since it's so long-winded.

But given how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can stay confident that my significantly slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in global innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.