test_unary.py 1.71 KB
Newer Older
1 2 3
"""Test compiler changes for unary ops (+, -, ~) introduced in Python 2.2"""

import unittest
4
from test.support import run_unittest
5 6 7 8

class UnaryOpTestCase(unittest.TestCase):

    def test_negative(self):
9
        self.assertTrue(-2 == 0 - 2)
10 11
        self.assertEqual(-0, 0)
        self.assertEqual(--2, 2)
12 13 14
        self.assertTrue(-2 == 0 - 2)
        self.assertTrue(-2.0 == 0 - 2.0)
        self.assertTrue(-2j == 0 - 2j)
15 16

    def test_positive(self):
17 18 19 20 21 22
        self.assertEqual(+2, 2)
        self.assertEqual(+0, 0)
        self.assertEqual(++2, 2)
        self.assertEqual(+2, 2)
        self.assertEqual(+2.0, 2.0)
        self.assertEqual(+2j, 2j)
23 24

    def test_invert(self):
25
        self.assertTrue(-2 == 0 - 2)
26 27
        self.assertEqual(-0, 0)
        self.assertEqual(--2, 2)
28
        self.assertTrue(-2 == 0 - 2)
29

30 31
    def test_no_overflow(self):
        nines = "9" * 32
32 33 34
        self.assertTrue(eval("+" + nines) == 10**32-1)
        self.assertTrue(eval("-" + nines) == -(10**32-1))
        self.assertTrue(eval("~" + nines) == ~(10**32-1))
35

36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43
    def test_negation_of_exponentiation(self):
        # Make sure '**' does the right thing; these form a
        # regression test for SourceForge bug #456756.
        self.assertEqual(-2 ** 3, -8)
        self.assertEqual((-2) ** 3, -8)
        self.assertEqual(-2 ** 4, -16)
        self.assertEqual((-2) ** 4, 16)

44 45
    def test_bad_types(self):
        for op in '+', '-', '~':
46
            self.assertRaises(TypeError, eval, op + "b'a'")
47 48 49 50 51
            self.assertRaises(TypeError, eval, op + "'a'")

        self.assertRaises(TypeError, eval, "~2j")
        self.assertRaises(TypeError, eval, "~2.0")

52 53 54 55 56 57 58

def test_main():
    run_unittest(UnaryOpTestCase)


if __name__ == "__main__":
    test_main()