• Jeffrey Yasskin's avatar
    Thread.start() used sleep(0.000001) to make sure it didn't return before the · 69e1309f
    Jeffrey Yasskin yazdı
    new thread had started. At least on my MacBook Pro, that wound up sleeping for
    a full 10ms (probably 1 jiffy). By using an Event instead, we can be absolutely
    certain that the thread has started, and return more quickly (217us).
    
    Before:
    $  ./python.exe -m timeit -s 'from threading import Thread'  't = Thread(); t.start(); t.join()'
    100 loops, best of 3: 10.3 msec per loop
    $  ./python.exe -m timeit -s 'from threading import Thread; t = Thread()'  't.isAlive()'
    1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.47 usec per loop
    
    After:
    $  ./python.exe -m timeit -s 'from threading import Thread'  't = Thread(); t.start(); t.join()'
    1000 loops, best of 3: 217 usec per loop
    $  ./python.exe -m timeit -s 'from threading import Thread; t = Thread()'  't.isAlive()'
    1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.86 usec per loop
    
    To be fair, the 10ms isn't CPU time, and other threads including the spawned
    one get to run during it. There are also some slightly more complicated ways to
    get back the .4us in isAlive() if we want.
    69e1309f
threading.py 27.2 KB