Kaydet (Commit) 1f41f846 authored tarafından Guido van Rossum's avatar Guido van Rossum

Instead of calling mktime(), which has all sorts of unwanted side

effects, simply zero out the struct tm buffer before using it; this
should take care of the BSD folks' concern just as well.
üst d30dc0a5
......@@ -304,6 +304,8 @@ time_strftime(self, args)
char *outbuf = 0;
int i;
memset((ANY *) &buf, '\0', sizeof(buf));
if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s(iiiiiiiii)",
&fmt,
&(buf.tm_year),
......@@ -321,12 +323,6 @@ time_strftime(self, args)
buf.tm_mon--;
buf.tm_wday = (buf.tm_wday + 1) % 7;
buf.tm_yday--;
#ifdef HAVE_MKTIME
/* This call is only there to adjust the numbers to be within
bounds. When we don't have mktime(), we say the caller is
responsible for that... */
(void) mktime(&buf);
#endif
/* I hate these functions that presume you know how big the output
* will be ahead of time...
*/
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment