Kaydet (Commit) 3646ab98 authored tarafından Gustavo Niemeyer's avatar Gustavo Niemeyer

Fix for part of the problem mentioned in #725149 by Greg Chapman.

This problem is related to a wrong behavior from mark_save/restore(),
which don't restore the mark_stack_base before restoring the marks.
Greg's suggestion was to change the asserts, which happen to be
the only recursive ops that can continue the loop, but the problem would
happen to any operation with the same behavior. So, rather than
hardcoding this into asserts, I have changed mark_save/restore() to
always restore the stackbase before restoring the marks.

Both solutions should fix these two cases, presented by Greg:

>>> re.match('(a)(?:(?=(b)*)c)*', 'abb').groups()
('b', None)
>>> re.match('(a)((?!(b)*))*', 'abb').groups()
('b', None, None)

The rest of the bug and patch in #725149 must be discussed further.
üst c34f2555
......@@ -295,6 +295,13 @@ class ReTests(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertEqual(re.match('^((a)c|[ab])*?c', 'abc').groups(),
('b', None))
def test_bug_725149(self):
# mark_stack_base restoring before restoring marks
self.assertEqual(re.match('(a)(?:(?=(b)*)c)*', 'abb').groups(),
('a', None))
self.assertEqual(re.match('(a)((?!(b)*))*', 'abb').groups(),
('a', None, None))
def test_finditer(self):
iter = re.finditer(r":+", "a:b::c:::d")
self.assertEqual([item.group(0) for item in iter],
......
......@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ mark_fini(SRE_STATE* state)
}
static int
mark_save(SRE_STATE* state, int lo, int hi)
mark_save(SRE_STATE* state, int lo, int hi, int *mark_stack_base)
{
void* stack;
int size;
......@@ -323,11 +323,13 @@ mark_save(SRE_STATE* state, int lo, int hi)
state->mark_stack_base += size;
*mark_stack_base = state->mark_stack_base;
return 0;
}
static int
mark_restore(SRE_STATE* state, int lo, int hi)
mark_restore(SRE_STATE* state, int lo, int hi, int *mark_stack_base)
{
int size;
......@@ -336,7 +338,7 @@ mark_restore(SRE_STATE* state, int lo, int hi)
size = (hi - lo) + 1;
state->mark_stack_base -= size;
state->mark_stack_base = *mark_stack_base - size;
TRACE(("copy %d:%d from %d\n", lo, hi, state->mark_stack_base));
......@@ -712,7 +714,7 @@ SRE_MATCH(SRE_STATE* state, SRE_CODE* pattern, int level)
SRE_CHAR* ptr = state->ptr;
int i, count;
SRE_REPEAT* rp;
int lastmark, lastindex;
int lastmark, lastindex, mark_stack_base;
SRE_CODE chr;
SRE_REPEAT rep; /* FIXME: <fl> allocate in STATE instead */
......@@ -948,7 +950,7 @@ SRE_MATCH(SRE_STATE* state, SRE_CODE* pattern, int level)
(ptr >= end || !SRE_CHARSET(pattern + 3, (SRE_CODE) *ptr)))
continue;
if (state->repeat) {
i = mark_save(state, 0, lastmark);
i = mark_save(state, 0, lastmark, &mark_stack_base);
if (i < 0)
return i;
}
......@@ -957,7 +959,7 @@ SRE_MATCH(SRE_STATE* state, SRE_CODE* pattern, int level)
if (i)
return i;
if (state->repeat) {
i = mark_restore(state, 0, lastmark);
i = mark_restore(state, 0, lastmark, &mark_stack_base);
if (i < 0)
return i;
}
......@@ -1157,14 +1159,14 @@ SRE_MATCH(SRE_STATE* state, SRE_CODE* pattern, int level)
/* we may have enough matches, but if we can
match another item, do so */
rp->count = count;
i = mark_save(state, 0, lastmark);
i = mark_save(state, 0, lastmark, &mark_stack_base);
if (i < 0)
return i;
/* RECURSIVE */
i = SRE_MATCH(state, rp->pattern + 3, level + 1);
if (i)
return i;
i = mark_restore(state, 0, lastmark);
i = mark_restore(state, 0, lastmark, &mark_stack_base);
LASTMARK_RESTORE();
if (i < 0)
return i;
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment