Unverified Kaydet (Commit) 77d57818 authored tarafından Serhiy Storchaka's avatar Serhiy Storchaka Kaydeden (comit) GitHub

bpo-34318: Convert deprecation warnings to errors in assertRaises() etc. (GH-8623)

üst e349bf23
......@@ -157,16 +157,11 @@ class _AssertRaisesBaseContext(_BaseTestCaseContext):
if not _is_subtype(self.expected, self._base_type):
raise TypeError('%s() arg 1 must be %s' %
(name, self._base_type_str))
if args and args[0] is None:
warnings.warn("callable is None",
DeprecationWarning, 3)
args = ()
if not args:
self.msg = kwargs.pop('msg', None)
if kwargs:
warnings.warn('%r is an invalid keyword argument for '
'this function' % next(iter(kwargs)),
DeprecationWarning, 3)
raise TypeError('%r is an invalid keyword argument for '
'this function' % (next(iter(kwargs)),))
return self
callable_obj, *args = args
......
......@@ -1222,7 +1222,7 @@ test case
with self.assertRaises(self.failureException):
self.assertRaises(ExceptionMock, lambda: 0)
# Failure when the function is None
with self.assertWarns(DeprecationWarning):
with self.assertRaises(TypeError):
self.assertRaises(ExceptionMock, None)
# Failure when another exception is raised
with self.assertRaises(ExceptionMock):
......@@ -1253,8 +1253,7 @@ test case
with self.assertRaises(ExceptionMock, msg='foobar'):
pass
# Invalid keyword argument
with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, 'foobar'), \
self.assertRaises(AssertionError):
with self.assertRaisesRegex(TypeError, 'foobar'):
with self.assertRaises(ExceptionMock, foobar=42):
pass
# Failure when another exception is raised
......@@ -1295,7 +1294,7 @@ test case
self.assertRaisesRegex(ExceptionMock, re.compile('expect$'), Stub)
self.assertRaisesRegex(ExceptionMock, 'expect$', Stub)
with self.assertWarns(DeprecationWarning):
with self.assertRaises(TypeError):
self.assertRaisesRegex(ExceptionMock, 'expect$', None)
def testAssertNotRaisesRegex(self):
......@@ -1312,8 +1311,7 @@ test case
with self.assertRaisesRegex(Exception, 'expect', msg='foobar'):
pass
# Invalid keyword argument
with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, 'foobar'), \
self.assertRaises(AssertionError):
with self.assertRaisesRegex(TypeError, 'foobar'):
with self.assertRaisesRegex(Exception, 'expect', foobar=42):
pass
......@@ -1388,7 +1386,7 @@ test case
with self.assertRaises(self.failureException):
self.assertWarns(RuntimeWarning, lambda: 0)
# Failure when the function is None
with self.assertWarns(DeprecationWarning):
with self.assertRaises(TypeError):
self.assertWarns(RuntimeWarning, None)
# Failure when another warning is triggered
with warnings.catch_warnings():
......@@ -1433,8 +1431,7 @@ test case
with self.assertWarns(RuntimeWarning, msg='foobar'):
pass
# Invalid keyword argument
with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, 'foobar'), \
self.assertRaises(AssertionError):
with self.assertRaisesRegex(TypeError, 'foobar'):
with self.assertWarns(RuntimeWarning, foobar=42):
pass
# Failure when another warning is triggered
......@@ -1475,7 +1472,7 @@ test case
self.assertWarnsRegex(RuntimeWarning, "o+",
lambda: 0)
# Failure when the function is None
with self.assertWarns(DeprecationWarning):
with self.assertRaises(TypeError):
self.assertWarnsRegex(RuntimeWarning, "o+", None)
# Failure when another warning is triggered
with warnings.catch_warnings():
......@@ -1518,8 +1515,7 @@ test case
with self.assertWarnsRegex(RuntimeWarning, 'o+', msg='foobar'):
pass
# Invalid keyword argument
with self.assertWarnsRegex(DeprecationWarning, 'foobar'), \
self.assertRaises(AssertionError):
with self.assertRaisesRegex(TypeError, 'foobar'):
with self.assertWarnsRegex(RuntimeWarning, 'o+', foobar=42):
pass
# Failure when another warning is triggered
......
:func:`~unittest.TestCase.assertRaises`,
:func:`~unittest.TestCase.assertRaisesRegex`,
:func:`~unittest.TestCase.assertWarns` and
:func:`~unittest.TestCase.assertWarnsRegex` no longer success if the passed
callable is None. They no longer ignore unknown keyword arguments in the
context manager mode. A DeprecationWarning was raised in these cases
since Python 3.5.
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment