Kaydet (Commit) 9b7c74ca authored tarafından Marcel Plch's avatar Marcel Plch Kaydeden (comit) Victor Stinner

bpo-32962: Fix test_gdb failure in debug build with -mcet -fcf-protection -O0 (#6754)

When Python is built with the intel control-flow protection flags,
-mcet -fcf-protection, gdb is not able to read the stack without
actually jumping inside the function. This means an extra
'next' command is required to make the $pc (program counter)
enter the function and make the stack of the function exposed to gdb.
üst c1897eda
......@@ -162,7 +162,11 @@ class DebuggerTests(unittest.TestCase):
commands += ['set print entry-values no']
if cmds_after_breakpoint:
commands += cmds_after_breakpoint
# bpo-32962: When Python is compiled with -mcet -fcf-protection,
# arguments are unusable before running the first instruction
# of the function entry point. The 'next' command makes the
# required first step.
commands += ['next'] + cmds_after_breakpoint
else:
commands += ['backtrace']
......@@ -847,9 +851,12 @@ id(42)
id("first break point")
l = MyList()
''')
# bpo-32962: same case as in get_stack_trace():
# we need an additional 'next' command in order to read
# arguments of the innermost function of the call stack.
# Verify with "py-bt":
gdb_output = self.get_stack_trace(cmd,
cmds_after_breakpoint=['break wrapper_call', 'continue', 'py-bt'])
cmds_after_breakpoint=['break wrapper_call', 'continue', 'next', 'py-bt'])
self.assertRegex(gdb_output,
r"<method-wrapper u?'__init__' of MyList object at ")
......
Fixed test_gdb when Python is compiled with flags -mcet -fcf-protection -O0.
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment