Kaydet (Commit) e1d62e0b authored tarafından Andrey Egorov's avatar Andrey Egorov Kaydeden (comit) Andrew Svetlov

bpo-32015: Asyncio looping during simultaneously socket read/write an… (#4386)

* bpo-32015: Asyncio cycling during simultaneously socket read/write and reconnection

* Tests fix

* Tests fix

* News add

* Add new unit tests
üst 56935a53
......@@ -370,25 +370,25 @@ class BaseSelectorEventLoop(base_events.BaseEventLoop):
if self._debug and sock.gettimeout() != 0:
raise ValueError("the socket must be non-blocking")
fut = self.create_future()
self._sock_recv(fut, False, sock, n)
self._sock_recv(fut, None, sock, n)
return fut
def _sock_recv(self, fut, registered, sock, n):
def _sock_recv(self, fut, registered_fd, sock, n):
# _sock_recv() can add itself as an I/O callback if the operation can't
# be done immediately. Don't use it directly, call sock_recv().
fd = sock.fileno()
if registered:
if registered_fd is not None:
# Remove the callback early. It should be rare that the
# selector says the fd is ready but the call still returns
# EAGAIN, and I am willing to take a hit in that case in
# order to simplify the common case.
self.remove_reader(fd)
self.remove_reader(registered_fd)
if fut.cancelled():
return
try:
data = sock.recv(n)
except (BlockingIOError, InterruptedError):
self.add_reader(fd, self._sock_recv, fut, True, sock, n)
fd = sock.fileno()
self.add_reader(fd, self._sock_recv, fut, fd, sock, n)
except Exception as exc:
fut.set_exception(exc)
else:
......@@ -405,25 +405,25 @@ class BaseSelectorEventLoop(base_events.BaseEventLoop):
if self._debug and sock.gettimeout() != 0:
raise ValueError("the socket must be non-blocking")
fut = self.create_future()
self._sock_recv_into(fut, False, sock, buf)
self._sock_recv_into(fut, None, sock, buf)
return fut
def _sock_recv_into(self, fut, registered, sock, buf):
def _sock_recv_into(self, fut, registered_fd, sock, buf):
# _sock_recv_into() can add itself as an I/O callback if the operation
# can't be done immediately. Don't use it directly, call sock_recv_into().
fd = sock.fileno()
if registered:
if registered_fd is not None:
# Remove the callback early. It should be rare that the
# selector says the fd is ready but the call still returns
# EAGAIN, and I am willing to take a hit in that case in
# order to simplify the common case.
self.remove_reader(fd)
self.remove_reader(registered_fd)
if fut.cancelled():
return
try:
nbytes = sock.recv_into(buf)
except (BlockingIOError, InterruptedError):
self.add_reader(fd, self._sock_recv_into, fut, True, sock, buf)
fd = sock.fileno()
self.add_reader(fd, self._sock_recv_into, fut, fd, sock, buf)
except Exception as exc:
fut.set_exception(exc)
else:
......@@ -444,16 +444,14 @@ class BaseSelectorEventLoop(base_events.BaseEventLoop):
raise ValueError("the socket must be non-blocking")
fut = self.create_future()
if data:
self._sock_sendall(fut, False, sock, data)
self._sock_sendall(fut, None, sock, data)
else:
fut.set_result(None)
return fut
def _sock_sendall(self, fut, registered, sock, data):
fd = sock.fileno()
if registered:
self.remove_writer(fd)
def _sock_sendall(self, fut, registered_fd, sock, data):
if registered_fd is not None:
self.remove_writer(registered_fd)
if fut.cancelled():
return
......@@ -470,7 +468,8 @@ class BaseSelectorEventLoop(base_events.BaseEventLoop):
else:
if n:
data = data[n:]
self.add_writer(fd, self._sock_sendall, fut, True, sock, data)
fd = sock.fileno()
self.add_writer(fd, self._sock_sendall, fut, fd, sock, data)
@coroutine
def sock_connect(self, sock, address):
......
......@@ -182,7 +182,27 @@ class BaseSelectorEventLoopTests(test_utils.TestCase):
f = self.loop.sock_recv(sock, 1024)
self.assertIsInstance(f, asyncio.Future)
self.loop._sock_recv.assert_called_with(f, False, sock, 1024)
self.loop._sock_recv.assert_called_with(f, None, sock, 1024)
def test_sock_recv_reconnection(self):
sock = mock.Mock()
sock.fileno.return_value = 10
sock.recv.side_effect = BlockingIOError
self.loop.add_reader = mock.Mock()
self.loop.remove_reader = mock.Mock()
fut = self.loop.sock_recv(sock, 1024)
callback = self.loop.add_reader.call_args[0][1]
params = self.loop.add_reader.call_args[0][2:]
# emulate the old socket has closed, but the new one has
# the same fileno, so callback is called with old (closed) socket
sock.fileno.return_value = -1
sock.recv.side_effect = OSError(9)
callback(*params)
self.assertIsInstance(fut.exception(), OSError)
self.assertEqual((10,), self.loop.remove_reader.call_args[0])
def test__sock_recv_canceled_fut(self):
sock = mock.Mock()
......@@ -190,7 +210,7 @@ class BaseSelectorEventLoopTests(test_utils.TestCase):
f = asyncio.Future(loop=self.loop)
f.cancel()
self.loop._sock_recv(f, False, sock, 1024)
self.loop._sock_recv(f, None, sock, 1024)
self.assertFalse(sock.recv.called)
def test__sock_recv_unregister(self):
......@@ -201,7 +221,7 @@ class BaseSelectorEventLoopTests(test_utils.TestCase):
f.cancel()
self.loop.remove_reader = mock.Mock()
self.loop._sock_recv(f, True, sock, 1024)
self.loop._sock_recv(f, 10, sock, 1024)
self.assertEqual((10,), self.loop.remove_reader.call_args[0])
def test__sock_recv_tryagain(self):
......@@ -211,8 +231,8 @@ class BaseSelectorEventLoopTests(test_utils.TestCase):
sock.recv.side_effect = BlockingIOError
self.loop.add_reader = mock.Mock()
self.loop._sock_recv(f, False, sock, 1024)
self.assertEqual((10, self.loop._sock_recv, f, True, sock, 1024),
self.loop._sock_recv(f, None, sock, 1024)
self.assertEqual((10, self.loop._sock_recv, f, 10, sock, 1024),
self.loop.add_reader.call_args[0])
def test__sock_recv_exception(self):
......@@ -221,7 +241,7 @@ class BaseSelectorEventLoopTests(test_utils.TestCase):
sock.fileno.return_value = 10
err = sock.recv.side_effect = OSError()
self.loop._sock_recv(f, False, sock, 1024)
self.loop._sock_recv(f, None, sock, 1024)
self.assertIs(err, f.exception())
def test_sock_sendall(self):
......@@ -231,7 +251,7 @@ class BaseSelectorEventLoopTests(test_utils.TestCase):
f = self.loop.sock_sendall(sock, b'data')
self.assertIsInstance(f, asyncio.Future)
self.assertEqual(
(f, False, sock, b'data'),
(f, None, sock, b'data'),
self.loop._sock_sendall.call_args[0])
def test_sock_sendall_nodata(self):
......@@ -244,13 +264,33 @@ class BaseSelectorEventLoopTests(test_utils.TestCase):
self.assertIsNone(f.result())
self.assertFalse(self.loop._sock_sendall.called)
def test_sock_sendall_reconnection(self):
sock = mock.Mock()
sock.fileno.return_value = 10
sock.send.side_effect = BlockingIOError
self.loop.add_writer = mock.Mock()
self.loop.remove_writer = mock.Mock()
fut = self.loop.sock_sendall(sock, b'data')
callback = self.loop.add_writer.call_args[0][1]
params = self.loop.add_writer.call_args[0][2:]
# emulate the old socket has closed, but the new one has
# the same fileno, so callback is called with old (closed) socket
sock.fileno.return_value = -1
sock.send.side_effect = OSError(9)
callback(*params)
self.assertIsInstance(fut.exception(), OSError)
self.assertEqual((10,), self.loop.remove_writer.call_args[0])
def test__sock_sendall_canceled_fut(self):
sock = mock.Mock()
f = asyncio.Future(loop=self.loop)
f.cancel()
self.loop._sock_sendall(f, False, sock, b'data')
self.loop._sock_sendall(f, None, sock, b'data')
self.assertFalse(sock.send.called)
def test__sock_sendall_unregister(self):
......@@ -261,7 +301,7 @@ class BaseSelectorEventLoopTests(test_utils.TestCase):
f.cancel()
self.loop.remove_writer = mock.Mock()
self.loop._sock_sendall(f, True, sock, b'data')
self.loop._sock_sendall(f, 10, sock, b'data')
self.assertEqual((10,), self.loop.remove_writer.call_args[0])
def test__sock_sendall_tryagain(self):
......@@ -271,9 +311,9 @@ class BaseSelectorEventLoopTests(test_utils.TestCase):
sock.send.side_effect = BlockingIOError
self.loop.add_writer = mock.Mock()
self.loop._sock_sendall(f, False, sock, b'data')
self.loop._sock_sendall(f, None, sock, b'data')
self.assertEqual(
(10, self.loop._sock_sendall, f, True, sock, b'data'),
(10, self.loop._sock_sendall, f, 10, sock, b'data'),
self.loop.add_writer.call_args[0])
def test__sock_sendall_interrupted(self):
......@@ -283,9 +323,9 @@ class BaseSelectorEventLoopTests(test_utils.TestCase):
sock.send.side_effect = InterruptedError
self.loop.add_writer = mock.Mock()
self.loop._sock_sendall(f, False, sock, b'data')
self.loop._sock_sendall(f, None, sock, b'data')
self.assertEqual(
(10, self.loop._sock_sendall, f, True, sock, b'data'),
(10, self.loop._sock_sendall, f, 10, sock, b'data'),
self.loop.add_writer.call_args[0])
def test__sock_sendall_exception(self):
......@@ -294,7 +334,7 @@ class BaseSelectorEventLoopTests(test_utils.TestCase):
sock.fileno.return_value = 10
err = sock.send.side_effect = OSError()
self.loop._sock_sendall(f, False, sock, b'data')
self.loop._sock_sendall(f, None, sock, b'data')
self.assertIs(f.exception(), err)
def test__sock_sendall(self):
......@@ -304,7 +344,7 @@ class BaseSelectorEventLoopTests(test_utils.TestCase):
sock.fileno.return_value = 10
sock.send.return_value = 4
self.loop._sock_sendall(f, False, sock, b'data')
self.loop._sock_sendall(f, None, sock, b'data')
self.assertTrue(f.done())
self.assertIsNone(f.result())
......@@ -316,10 +356,10 @@ class BaseSelectorEventLoopTests(test_utils.TestCase):
sock.send.return_value = 2
self.loop.add_writer = mock.Mock()
self.loop._sock_sendall(f, False, sock, b'data')
self.loop._sock_sendall(f, None, sock, b'data')
self.assertFalse(f.done())
self.assertEqual(
(10, self.loop._sock_sendall, f, True, sock, b'ta'),
(10, self.loop._sock_sendall, f, 10, sock, b'ta'),
self.loop.add_writer.call_args[0])
def test__sock_sendall_none(self):
......@@ -330,10 +370,10 @@ class BaseSelectorEventLoopTests(test_utils.TestCase):
sock.send.return_value = 0
self.loop.add_writer = mock.Mock()
self.loop._sock_sendall(f, False, sock, b'data')
self.loop._sock_sendall(f, None, sock, b'data')
self.assertFalse(f.done())
self.assertEqual(
(10, self.loop._sock_sendall, f, True, sock, b'data'),
(10, self.loop._sock_sendall, f, 10, sock, b'data'),
self.loop.add_writer.call_args[0])
def test_sock_connect_timeout(self):
......
Fixed the looping of asyncio in the case of reconnection the socket during
waiting async read/write from/to the socket.
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment