Kaydet (Commit) e39a80c3 authored tarafından Tim Peters's avatar Tim Peters

Bite the bullet on all the indirect timetz and datetimetz tzinfo methods:

make the callers figure out the right tzinfo arguments to pass, instead of
making the callees guess.  The code is uglier this way, but it's less
brittle (when the callee guesses, the caller can get surprised).
üst a37e5cce
......@@ -803,13 +803,15 @@ typedef enum {
* the "naivety" typedef for details. If the type is aware, *offset is set
* to minutes east of UTC (as returned by the tzinfo.utcoffset() method).
* If the type is offset-naive (or unknown, or error), *offset is set to 0.
* tzinfoarg is the argument to pass to the tzinfo.utcoffset() method.
*/
static naivety
classify_utcoffset(PyObject *op, int *offset)
classify_utcoffset(PyObject *op, PyObject *tzinfoarg, int *offset)
{
int none;
PyObject *tzinfo;
assert(tzinfoarg != NULL);
*offset = 0;
tzinfo = get_tzinfo_member(op); /* NULL means no tzinfo, not error */
if (tzinfo == Py_None)
......@@ -819,9 +821,7 @@ classify_utcoffset(PyObject *op, int *offset)
return (PyTime_Check(op) || PyDate_Check(op)) ?
OFFSET_NAIVE : OFFSET_UNKNOWN;
}
*offset = call_utcoffset(tzinfo,
PyTimeTZ_Check(op) ? Py_None : op,
&none);
*offset = call_utcoffset(tzinfo, tzinfoarg, &none);
if (*offset == -1 && PyErr_Occurred())
return OFFSET_ERROR;
return none ? OFFSET_NAIVE : OFFSET_AWARE;
......@@ -838,17 +838,19 @@ classify_utcoffset(PyObject *op, int *offset)
*/
static int
classify_two_utcoffsets(PyObject *o1, int *offset1, naivety *n1,
PyObject *o2, int *offset2, naivety *n2)
PyObject *tzinfoarg1,
PyObject *o2, int *offset2, naivety *n2,
PyObject *tzinfoarg2)
{
if (get_tzinfo_member(o1) == get_tzinfo_member(o2)) {
*offset1 = *offset2 = 0;
*n1 = *n2 = OFFSET_NAIVE;
}
else {
*n1 = classify_utcoffset(o1, offset1);
*n1 = classify_utcoffset(o1, tzinfoarg1, offset1);
if (*n1 == OFFSET_ERROR)
return -1;
*n2 = classify_utcoffset(o2, offset2);
*n2 = classify_utcoffset(o2, tzinfoarg2, offset2);
if (*n2 == OFFSET_ERROR)
return -1;
}
......@@ -3177,7 +3179,9 @@ datetime_richcompare(PyDateTime_DateTime *self, PyObject *other, int op)
}
if (classify_two_utcoffsets((PyObject *)self, &offset1, &n1,
other, &offset2, &n2) < 0)
(PyObject *)self,
other, &offset2, &n2,
other) < 0)
return NULL;
assert(n1 != OFFSET_UNKNOWN && n2 != OFFSET_UNKNOWN);
/* If they're both naive, or both aware and have the same offsets,
......@@ -3231,7 +3235,8 @@ datetime_hash(PyDateTime_DateTime *self)
int offset;
PyObject *temp;
n = classify_utcoffset((PyObject *)self, &offset);
n = classify_utcoffset((PyObject *)self, (PyObject *)self,
&offset);
assert(n != OFFSET_UNKNOWN);
if (n == OFFSET_ERROR)
return -1;
......@@ -3690,8 +3695,8 @@ time_richcompare(PyDateTime_Time *self, PyObject *other, int op)
other->ob_type->tp_name);
return NULL;
}
if (classify_two_utcoffsets((PyObject *)self, &offset1, &n1,
other, &offset2, &n2) < 0)
if (classify_two_utcoffsets((PyObject *)self, &offset1, &n1, Py_None,
other, &offset2, &n2, Py_None) < 0)
return NULL;
assert(n1 != OFFSET_UNKNOWN && n2 != OFFSET_UNKNOWN);
/* If they're both naive, or both aware and have the same offsets,
......@@ -3739,7 +3744,7 @@ time_hash(PyDateTime_Time *self)
int offset;
PyObject *temp;
n = classify_utcoffset((PyObject *)self, &offset);
n = classify_utcoffset((PyObject *)self, Py_None, &offset);
assert(n != OFFSET_UNKNOWN);
if (n == OFFSET_ERROR)
return -1;
......@@ -4628,8 +4633,9 @@ datetimetz_subtract(PyObject *left, PyObject *right)
int offset1, offset2;
PyDateTime_Delta *delta;
if (classify_two_utcoffsets(left, &offset1, &n1,
right, &offset2, &n2) < 0)
if (classify_two_utcoffsets(left, &offset1, &n1, left,
right, &offset2, &n2,
right) < 0)
return NULL;
assert(n1 != OFFSET_UNKNOWN && n2 != OFFSET_UNKNOWN);
if (n1 != n2) {
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment