1. 06 Şub, 2005 1 kayıt (commit)
  2. 20 Eki, 2004 1 kayıt (commit)
  3. 20 Eki, 2003 1 kayıt (commit)
  4. 11 Tem, 2003 1 kayıt (commit)
    • Andrew MacIntyre's avatar
      patch #766650 - whichdb not identifying dbm DBs when dbm linked with gdbm · a1e93e8d
      Andrew MacIntyre yazdı
      At this point, the problem appears particular to the OS/2 EMX port of
      gdbm (which is at v1.7.3) - this combination produces a .pag file but
      no .dir file.
      
      A more sophisticated patch which checks magic numbers when dbm.library
      indicates that dbm is linked to gdbm, and there is no .dir file, is
      still attached to the above patch entry for reconsideration after 2.3
      is released.
      
      This checkin applies a workaround specific to the known failure case.
      a1e93e8d
  5. 21 Haz, 2003 1 kayıt (commit)
  6. 14 Haz, 2003 1 kayıt (commit)
  7. 06 May, 2003 1 kayıt (commit)
  8. 02 Agu, 2002 1 kayıt (commit)
  9. 24 Eki, 2001 1 kayıt (commit)
  10. 16 Mar, 2001 1 kayıt (commit)
  11. 02 Mar, 2001 1 kayıt (commit)
  12. 01 Mar, 2001 1 kayıt (commit)
  13. 04 Agu, 2000 1 kayıt (commit)
  14. 29 Tem, 2000 1 kayıt (commit)
  15. 10 Şub, 2000 1 kayıt (commit)
  16. 08 Haz, 1999 1 kayıt (commit)
    • Guido van Rossum's avatar
      Skip Montanaro: · cf09a392
      Guido van Rossum yazdı
      I guess in 1.5.2 a new module, whichdb, was added that attempts to
      divine the nature of a database file.  This module doesn't know anything
      about Berkeley DB v2 files.  In v2, Sleepycat added a 12-byte null pad
      in front of the old magic numbers (at least for hash and btree files).
      I've been using v2 for awhile and upgrading to 1.5.2 broke all my
      anydbm.open calls. I believe the following patch corrects the problem.
      cf09a392
  17. 28 Nis, 1998 1 kayıt (commit)
  18. 26 Mar, 1998 1 kayıt (commit)
  19. 11 Ock, 1997 1 kayıt (commit)
  20. 30 Tem, 1996 1 kayıt (commit)