Kaydet (Commit) 07e756f5 authored tarafından Stephan Bergmann's avatar Stephan Bergmann

-Werror,-Wconstexpr-not-const

...at least current trunk towards Clang 3.4 complains "'constexpr' non-static
member function will not be implicitly 'const' in C++1y; add 'const' to avoid a
change in behavior."

Change-Id: Id3d1af263040fdea2c2f5d0bc6a037d7a17184bd
üst 1de66ba4
......@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ boost_patches += boost.std.move.patch
boost_patches += boost.wundef.patch
boost_patches += boost.wunused.patch
boost_patches += boost.wshadow.patch
boost_patches += boost.wconstexpr-not-const.patch.0
$(eval $(call gb_UnpackedTarball_UnpackedTarball,boost))
......
--- boost/chrono/duration.hpp
+++ boost/chrono/duration.hpp
@@ -663,36 +663,36 @@
template <class LhsDuration, class RhsDuration>
struct duration_eq
{
- BOOST_CONSTEXPR bool operator()(const LhsDuration& lhs, const RhsDuration& rhs)
+ BOOST_CONSTEXPR bool operator()(const LhsDuration& lhs, const RhsDuration& rhs) const
{
typedef typename common_type<LhsDuration, RhsDuration>::type CD;
return CD(lhs).count() == CD(rhs).count();
}
};
template <class LhsDuration>
struct duration_eq<LhsDuration, LhsDuration>
{
- BOOST_CONSTEXPR bool operator()(const LhsDuration& lhs, const LhsDuration& rhs)
+ BOOST_CONSTEXPR bool operator()(const LhsDuration& lhs, const LhsDuration& rhs) const
{
return lhs.count() == rhs.count();
}
};
template <class LhsDuration, class RhsDuration>
struct duration_lt
{
- BOOST_CONSTEXPR bool operator()(const LhsDuration& lhs, const RhsDuration& rhs)
+ BOOST_CONSTEXPR bool operator()(const LhsDuration& lhs, const RhsDuration& rhs) const
{
typedef typename common_type<LhsDuration, RhsDuration>::type CD;
return CD(lhs).count() < CD(rhs).count();
}
};
template <class LhsDuration>
struct duration_lt<LhsDuration, LhsDuration>
{
- BOOST_CONSTEXPR bool operator()(const LhsDuration& lhs, const LhsDuration& rhs)
+ BOOST_CONSTEXPR bool operator()(const LhsDuration& lhs, const LhsDuration& rhs) const
{
return lhs.count() < rhs.count();
}
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment