Revert "ugly hack for NS_ooxml::LN_CT_Style_type being the first attribute...

I believe this is not necessary after the recent removal of unordered_map from
handling the attributes.

This reverts commit 76336334.

Change-Id: I631bc2613954953a30448dbe2a5bf564c529e2a0

writerfilter/source/ooxml/OOXMLPropertySetImpl.cxx

@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
 #include <resourcemodel/QNameToString.hxx>
 #include <com/sun/star/drawing/XShape.hpp>
 #include <oox/token/tokens.hxx>
-#include <ooxml/resourceids.hxx>
 
 namespace writerfilter {
 namespace ooxml
@@ -471,20 +470,7 @@ void OOXMLPropertySetImpl::add(OOXMLProperty::Pointer_t pProperty)
 {
     if (pProperty.get() != NULL && pProperty->getId() != 0x0)
     {
-        /*
-         HACK: Ugly hack. This retarded overdesigned writerfilter thing
-         processes attributes in random order (as given by boost::unordered_map
-         when iterating it), but StyleSheetTable::lcl_attribute() needs
-         to know whether NS_ooxml::LN_CT_Style_type is STYLE_TYPE_TABLE first.
-         And all this overdesigned machinery doesn't even give a reasonable
-         way to find out if an attribute is there before encountering it
-         in random order in lcl_attribute(), so just make sure here that
-         the attribute comes first.
-        */
-        if( pProperty->getId() == NS_ooxml::LN_CT_Style_type )
-            mProperties.insert( mProperties.begin(), pProperty );
-        else
-            mProperties.push_back(pProperty);
+        mProperties.push_back(pProperty);
     }
 }