fdo#65541: Proper EPM %requires dependencies, at least for Linux
At least for Linux RPM, the packages built via EPM in module instset_native (with --enable-epm) record intra-installation-set dependencies only by name but without any version numbers, so that one can e.g. freely ask rpm to install a (broken) combination of packages from LibreOffice_4.0.2_Linux_x86-64_rpm.tar.gz and LibreOffice_4.0.3_Linux_x86-64_rpm.tar.gz. The documentation for EPM (e.g., workdir/*/UnpackedTarball/epm/doc/epm- manual.pdf) states that %requires lines can optionally indicate lower and upper version numbers, so the easiest fix appears to be to augment all relevant "requires =" lines in setup_native/source/packinfo/packinfo_*.txt with lower == upper == %PACKAGEVERSION. (There appears to be some confusion in those files between %PACKAGEVERSION and %ABOUTBOXPRODUCTVERSION, but those seem to always get identical values in instsetoo_native/util/openoffice.lst.in.) Change-Id: Iea68beb19f1699cc1eea3dc36fd2f11b8845e390 TODO: The freebsdrequires and solarisrequires lines are not updated. Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4344Reviewed-by:David Tardon <dtardon@redhat.com> Tested-by:
David Tardon <dtardon@redhat.com>
Showing
This diff is collapsed.
This source diff could not be displayed because it is too large.
You can
view the blob
instead.
This diff is collapsed.
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment