- 25 Nis, 2012 30 kayıt (commit)
-
-
Michael Stahl yazdı
-
Noel Grandin yazdı
-
Noel Grandin yazdı
-
Noel Grandin yazdı
-
Noel Grandin yazdı
-
Noel Grandin yazdı
-
Noel Grandin yazdı
-
Noel Grandin yazdı
-
Noel Grandin yazdı
-
Noel Grandin yazdı
Had to use a class for the typedef declaration because the data structure is referenced in other header files.
-
Michael Stahl yazdı
-
Michael Stahl yazdı
-
Noel Grandin yazdı
-
Noel Grandin yazdı
-
Michael Stahl yazdı
Just wasted half an hour trying to track down a crash in sc unit test that was apparently caused by different object files being compiled with different OSL_DEBUG_LEVELs and thus some having XclDebugObjCounter and some not.
-
Miklos Vajna yazdı
-
Miklos Vajna yazdı
-
Miklos Vajna yazdı
-
Bjoern Michaelsen yazdı
- instead on lots of recursive build.pl modules to iterate through we build all tail_build up to the requested module inside one tail_build when doing a "make foo.all" - advantage: speeding up because getting rid of lots of recursive makes with artificial module barriers, forcing almost sequential execution: build, link, unittest with lots of cpu-idling at each module-end - disadvantage: all shared dependencies of tail_build are now build for a (sub)module of tail_build. This is transitional as we migrate more stuff into tail_build and there are good dependencies inside tail_build - "make foo.all" now only executes slowcheck now for foo, not for all the deps
-
Bjoern Michaelsen yazdı
-
Bjoern Michaelsen yazdı
-
Andras Timar yazdı
-
Tor Lillqvist yazdı
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
-
Catalin Iacob yazdı
-
Catalin Iacob yazdı
-
Catalin Iacob yazdı
-
Chr. Rossmanith yazdı
-
Tor Lillqvist yazdı
-
Miklos Vajna yazdı
-
- 24 Nis, 2012 10 kayıt (commit)
-
-
Markus Mohrhard yazdı
-
Takeshi Abe yazdı
-
Tor Lillqvist yazdı
Or maybe it's the Mach-O object file format that lacks the functionality? Anyway, let's try to manage without visibility then.
-
Tor Lillqvist yazdı
For unrecognized options, Clang 3.1 (and ealier?) prints out a warning, but it isn't a real warning as it doesn't cause a compilation error with -Werror, so it is impossible to find out reliably if an option is supported or not. So hardcode the information we know.
-
Tor Lillqvist yazdı
-
Tor Lillqvist yazdı
-
Andras Timar yazdı
Although Microsoft says that SelectionTree control can publish a control event only on Windows Server 2003 and above, the custom action seems to be working under a fully patched Windows XP SP3. Maybe it fails silently on older Windows XPs, not to mention Windows 2000. I did not test those.
-
Caolán McNamara yazdı
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...as checking the lastsynchronized time-stamps can give wrong results if new and old impl use same user config and old impl is started once more after new impl is installed, in which case per-user data of bundled exts of new impl would not be regenerated, leading to inconsistencies.
-
Stephan Bergmann yazdı
...otherwise, if they are bundled, their per-user data is not regenerated, leading to inconsitencies.
-