by using a byte-swapping pattern that coverity doesn't detect as such

tested as a scratch coverity attempt with a smaller project which
has a far higher allocation of coverity attempts per week :-)

unsigned int readTaintedUINT32(const char* buffer)
{
    unsigned int v = (
            (buffer[0] << 24) |
            (buffer[1] << 16) |
            (buffer[2] << 8)  |
            (buffer[3] << 0)
        );

    return v;
}

unsigned int readUntaintedUINT32(const char* p)
{
    unsigned int v = *p++; v <<= 8;
    v |= *p++; v <<= 8;
    v |= *p++; v <<= 8;
    return v | *p;
}

void foo(char *buffer)
{
    char *pOne = new char[readTaintedUINT32(buffer)];
	// ^ coverity only reports this
    delete [] pOne;

    char *pTwo = new char[readUntaintedUINT32(buffer)];
	// ^ and not this
    delete [] pTwo;
}

should silence

coverity#1213371 Untrusted value as argument
coverity#1213372 Untrusted value as argument
coverity#1213373 Use of untrusted scalar value
coverity#1213374 Use of untrusted scalar value
coverity#1213376 Untrusted loop bound
coverity#1213388 Use of untrusted scalar value
coverity#1213389 Use of untrusted scalar value
coverity#1213390 Use of untrusted scalar value
coverity#1213423 Untrusted value as argument
coverity#1213424 Untrusted value as argument
coverity#1213425 Untrusted value as argument
coverity#1213432 Untrusted value as argument
coverity#1215304 Untrusted loop bound

Change-Id: Ib8c7fc9a8e8b36ca227c76577d991c10df7dcd5a