The re-construction will be deferred until it becomes visible again.

Change-Id: I364ea8d38d48078dfd803b0e5bb20bfc8a2913ba

The correct fix unfortunately would require making the axis label layout
smarter, to avoid overlapping of angled text label objects.

Change-Id: I92198dbb90fd4a206ee226307992343d064f733a

Change-Id: I3bd8ab784d9af295b61555a3ed775097270b90bf

Change-Id: Id656f1ef1cdfb695bcfcb35e393def3682e8c556

Change-Id: Ia01ed40391a4d5725a9f9e22817406216020c0d2

Change-Id: I54554a229c03ff87096782344a728a49636c1de1

And absorb 2 special cases from SvxDrawPage::_CreateSdrObject().

Change-Id: I8e400794b9aef4b229b6760835b80dffd56cbc8d

Conflicts:
	svx/source/svdraw/svdoashp.cxx
	svx/source/svdraw/svdocirc.cxx
	svx/source/svdraw/svdograf.cxx
	svx/source/svdraw/svdoole2.cxx
	svx/source/svdraw/svdorect.cxx
	svx/source/svdraw/svdotext.cxx
	svx/source/svdraw/svdotxdr.cxx
	svx/source/svdraw/svdotxtr.cxx

Change-Id: I12dc6c12ee44753c63b15f03276cdaa24e57d395

Change-Id: I02499441f00d6499a576d97115df0ad1d85dcd5e

Change-Id: Id00917198bda71eb80768526375eb83ba46dba11

Change-Id: I3a5c944d6ed863c347da03e0a60ff653232b3e72

I hope the reason is obvious....

Change-Id: Ibe30038991b4916a6af230043176f09bd9952ff9

To pre-determine the size of the largest text label object, auto-staggering
strategy etc.  In theory (if I read the code correctly) we could achieve
the same thing by using only 3 ticks rather than 5.

Change-Id: Iee51588061e482c724ee4fb666c51c2a6b636e8c

This removes unnecessary static_cast's and check for negative values
which, from what I've read from the code, never happens.

Change-Id: I9d9e1de5b091df335dd3b7eeb34e4e8f98de0fbd

Change-Id: If80c4b0ceec5e0afd55d12ebe7511fb4f40b4797

So that we can do more aggressive optimization without breaking the other
cases.

Change-Id: I5d4ceb2a3b7f041f752a570827815236e9de58db

Change-Id: I56f1296f5a2df67ae9386ae9f30761aee0fde7f3

I'm starting to "get" this axis label layout code.

Change-Id: I797a92698cb81a1b9325f81b5275cb033cb7c342

Change-Id: I465e991c83cd5b711d73afd9407596ef1df70f27

Change-Id: I5572f4417a05132e46a4560088f519cdadfdaec1

Change-Id: I41067bf7503c591ce869ecfde111b049143bbb9a

Change-Id: Ie5782e6f450db91e1a66693163fba2b83441e9ae

Change-Id: Idf53b85d962406caf9ca1df636fffd8b3459baf5

Change-Id: I11b64b79de90d776fd117aa687c971ed80172b76
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/12245Reviewed-by: Tor Lillqvist <tml@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Tor Lillqvist <tml@collabora.com>

Change-Id: I5dcfdb3106bfe3e83a64443cd8aff1c7ba023a5b
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/12244Reviewed-by: Tor Lillqvist <tml@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Tor Lillqvist <tml@collabora.com>

Change-Id: I08993551473fb9a8284e2a1ed772c99050f785d8
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/12251Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com>

Baseline is Windows XP and SP3 includes directx 9.0c

Change-Id: Ib7095ebb71f297898ae8b316e3b9f18e7c052f34
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/12246Tested-by: LibreOffice gerrit bot <gerrit@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com>

Change-Id: Ie9767aaf0f78db14ac2bbf844e824f8d39191fd1

Looks like Commit 94e8385d added this
to the wrong enum.

Change-Id: I46dd82313aaa659e84c719ba9215682becf8ec6c

Change-Id: Ic29b569df25f8966326101d5179506b24483cb43

Change-Id: Ia1a3a4ef5e61d8ed2a3bde689f3d2101525efc46

Change-Id: I8020ce561a72f10b8f0f517d50407a802049bd48

Change-Id: I601d8473fbe7f989a2380cbd773a6b09c0563ddc

Change-Id: I09972ebec71a332d2f5a8630df7b5fecd2b78c87
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/12228Reviewed-by: Samuel Mehrbrodt <s.mehrbrodt@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Samuel Mehrbrodt <s.mehrbrodt@gmail.com>

Change-Id: I79d4e73f498f55ec3beece6c2e4aafe8f09c1c27
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/12249Reviewed-by: Samuel Mehrbrodt <s.mehrbrodt@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Samuel Mehrbrodt <s.mehrbrodt@gmail.com>

Change-Id: Ibb6fb9ea3e524a889de96f560e308a4aa54fa2af
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/12248Reviewed-by: Eike Rathke <erack@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Eike Rathke <erack@redhat.com>

in the loop we are in the same table
refactor ScTable::Search too

perfchek result for testSheetFindAll-Search value
before : 804252982
after :  229861999

Change-Id: I907f1260472bcc5d93b2c6425c342187a5f4c787
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/12225Reviewed-by: Eike Rathke <erack@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Eike Rathke <erack@redhat.com>

Change-Id: Ibc9345959462b5a1cb9e47791742217e567b3cd0

Change-Id: I3a4cec65307c517684d4f8a291ca73b6a212a857

Change-Id: Icd4df8610072f5283276738896cb5c01762838ea